Sound & Specs Comparison
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Facts, details, stuff.
General Info | AirPods 4 | Blessing 3 |
---|---|---|
Brand | Apple | Moondrop |
Country | USA | China |
IEM Description | – | The Moondrop Blessing 3 is a hybrid IEM that blends technical detail with a clean, spacious sound. Featuring dual dynamic drivers and four balanced armatures, it delivers tight bass, clear mids, and airy treble with impressive precision. The overall tuning is balanced with a slightly bright edge, making it well-suited for those who enjoy clarity and separation without excessive warmth. |
Price Level | n/a | 100 – 500 |
Housing & Driver | ||
---|---|---|
Driver Config | – | Hybrid |
Driver Types | – | Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature |
Shell Material | – | – |
Cable | – | – |
Technical | ||
---|---|---|
Freq Range | – | – |
Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
Crossover | – | – |
Platform Info | ||
---|---|---|
Comments | 0 | 0 |
Visit Count | 20 | 87 |
External Reviews | 0 | 0 |
In terms of overall sound impression, Blessing 3 undeniably surpasses AirPods 4. It presents music with materially greater accuracy, air, and stereo separation (8.5 vs 5). For comfort fit, It performs considerably better (8.5 vs 5). Even under close inspection, It maintains a faintly cleaner, more seamless design — whereas AirPods 4 occasionally reveals minor imperfections. It's accessories are decisively better curated, reflecting greater attention to usability, presentation, and value-added content compared to AirPods 4.
AirPods 4 | Blessing 3 | |
---|---|---|
Sound | 5.0 | 8.5 |
Comfort Fit | 5.0 | 8.5 |
Build Quality | 7.0 | 7.5 |
Stock Cable | – | 7.3 |
Accessories | 1.5 | 7.3 |
Low-frequency extension on Blessing 3 feels m more natural and authoritative, while AirPods 4 lacks some reach (6 vs 4.5). Listeners may find the low-end impact on It a more engaging during high-dynamic passages (6.8 vs 5). Male vocals and lower instruments sound a richer and better defined on It, unlike AirPods 4 which can seem hollow (7.3 vs 5.5). Upper mids are a more resolving and expressive on It, revealing emotion and articulation better than AirPods 4 (7 vs 6). It extends a further into the upper treble, adding air and openness that AirPods 4 lacks (7.3 vs 6.5). The stereo field on It feels n wider and more holographic, whereas AirPods 4 sounds more intimate (7.3 vs 6). It retrieves micro-details d more effectively, revealing nuances that are less apparent in AirPods 4 (6.8 vs 5). In complex arrangements, It separates layers a more distinctly, preventing overlap that AirPods 4 occasionally suffers (6 vs 5). The note presentation is c fuller and more tactile on It, giving instruments a stronger physical presence than AirPods 4 (6.3 vs 5). It delivers a stronger slam and physicality, making drums and transients hit harder than AirPods 4 (6 vs 5). AirPods 4 handles sibilant sounds m more gently, with fewer peaks and less sharpness than Blessing 3 (6.5 vs 4.8). Timbre on It sounds s more realistic and natural, whereas Blessing 3 feels slightly more artificial or colored (5.5 vs 5). The overall tonality of Blessing 3 is m more balanced and cohesive, offering a sound signature that feels better tuned than AirPods 4 (6.8 vs 5). It portrays textures in vocals and strings with a more realism, enhancing emotional depth over AirPods 4 (6.8 vs 4.5).
AirPods 4 | Blessing 3 | |
---|---|---|
Sub Bass | 4.5 | 6.0 |
Bass | 5.5 | 5.5 |
Bass Feel | 5.0 | 6.8 |
Lower Mids | 5.5 | 7.3 |
Upper Mids | 6.0 | 7.0 |
Lower Treble | 6.5 | 6.8 |
Upper Treble | 6.5 | 7.3 |
Sound Stage Width | 6.0 | 7.3 |
Detail | 5.0 | 6.8 |
Layering | 5.0 | 6.0 |
Masking | 5.0 | 5.3 |
Note Weight | 5.0 | 6.3 |
Slam | 5.0 | 6.0 |
Sibilance | 6.5 | 4.8 |
Timbre Color | 5.5 | 5.0 |
Tonality | 5.0 | 6.8 |
Texture | 4.5 | 6.8 |
// Nothing to compare yet.