AirPods 4vs.Kato
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | AirPods 4 | Kato |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Apple | Moondrop |
| Country | USA | China |
| IEM Description | – | – |
| Price Level | n/a | 100 – 500 |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | – | Single Dyn. Driver |
| Driver Types | – | Dynamic Driver |
| Shell Material | – | – |
| Cable | – | – |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | – | – |
| Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
| Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
| Crossover | – | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 0 | 0 |
| Visit Count | 20 | 21 |
| External Reviews | 0 | 0 |
Meta Ratings
For comfort fit, AirPods 4 performs softly better (5 vs 4.5). Accessory-wise, Kato includes immensely more practical and high-quality items, enhancing both protection and usability.
| AirPods 4 | Kato | |
|---|---|---|
| Sound | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Comfort Fit | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| Build Quality | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| Stock Cable | – | 6.0 |
| Accessories | 1.5 | 6.5 |
Sound Characteristics
AirPods 4 delivers a tighter sub-bass response, controlling low-end rumble with more precision than Kato (4.5 vs 3). It enhances basslines with s more energy and grip, giving them a livelier feel compared to Kato (5.5 vs 4). It adds d more body and slam to bass hits, which makes it feel more physical than Kato (5 vs 3). It achieves a better warmth and coherence in the lower mids, bringing more realism to guitars and cellos (5.5 vs 4). Upper mids are a more resolving and expressive on It, revealing emotion and articulation better than Kato (6 vs 4). Instruments like violins and brass are portrayed with d more brilliance on It, while Kato sounds slightly dull (6.5 vs 5). The upper treble of It extends s further, offering more sparkle and openness than Kato (6.5 vs 5). Listeners may notice that It presents sounds with a more lateral space, giving recordings more openness than Kato (6 vs 4). The retrieval of faint audio cues on It is a more convincing, while Kato tends to gloss over them (5 vs 4). It separates instruments a more distinctly, helping complex passages remain coherent where Kato blends them (5 vs 4.5). Instruments remain intelligible on It even during busy sections, showing c better handling of masking than Kato (5 vs 4). It adds a more body and density to musical notes, enriching the overall texture compared to Kato (5 vs 2). Percussion and quick attacks feel n more physical and punchy on It, adding excitement over Kato (5 vs 2). It handles sibilant sounds n more gently, with fewer peaks and less sharpness than Kato (6.5 vs 4). Timbre on It sounds a more realistic and natural, whereas Kato feels slightly more artificial or colored (5.5 vs 5). Kato portrays textures in vocals and strings with s more realism, enhancing emotional depth over AirPods 4 (5 vs 4.5).
| AirPods 4 | Kato | |
|---|---|---|
| Sub Bass | 4.5 | 3.0 |
| Bass | 5.5 | 4.0 |
| Bass Feel | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| Lower Mids | 5.5 | 4.0 |
| Upper Mids | 6.0 | 4.0 |
| Lower Treble | 6.5 | 5.0 |
| Upper Treble | 6.5 | 5.0 |
| Sound Stage Width | 6.0 | 4.0 |
| Detail | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Layering | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| Masking | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Note Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| Slam | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| Sibilance | 6.5 | 4.0 |
| Timbre Color | 5.5 | 5.0 |
| Tonality | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Texture | 4.5 | 5.0 |
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.