AirPods 4vs.Solo
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | AirPods 4 | Solo |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Apple | 64 Audio |
| Country | USA | USA |
| IEM Description | – | – |
| Price Level | n/a | 1.000 – 2.000 |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | – | – |
| Driver Types | – | Planar Magnetic Driver |
| Shell Material | – | – |
| Cable | – | – |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | – | – |
| Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
| Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
| Crossover | – | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 0 | 0 |
| Visit Count | 20 | 27 |
| External Reviews | 0 | 0 |
Meta Ratings
Sound-wise, Solo provides a considerably more refined presentation, with improved detail retrieval, microdynamics, and instrument layering when compared to AirPods 4 (7.5 vs 5). For comfort fit, It performs considerably better (8 vs 5). The structural integrity of It is distinctly more convincing, delivering a sense of refinement and premium craftsmanship that AirPods 4 struggles to match. Compared to AirPods 4, the overall accessory offering from It is vastly more aligned with the expectations of discerning audiophiles.
| AirPods 4 | Solo | |
|---|---|---|
| Sound | 5.0 | 7.5 |
| Comfort Fit | 5.0 | 8.0 |
| Build Quality | 7.0 | 8.5 |
| Stock Cable | – | 7.0 |
| Accessories | 1.5 | 6.5 |
Sound Characteristics
Low-frequency extension on Solo feels a more natural and authoritative, while AirPods 4 lacks some reach (5.5 vs 4.5). It enhances basslines with b more energy and grip, giving them a livelier feel compared to AirPods 4 (6 vs 5.5). Listeners may find the low-end impact on It a more engaging during high-dynamic passages (5.5 vs 5). It achieves s better warmth and coherence in the lower mids, bringing more realism to guitars and cellos (7.5 vs 5.5). It reproduces female vocals and strings with c more air and forwardness, while AirPods 4 remains recessed (7 vs 6). AirPods 4 extends a further into the upper treble, adding air and openness that Solo lacks (6.5 vs 5.5). It creates a n wider soundstage, giving instruments more space and a better sense of placement than Solo (6 vs 5). Solo retrieves micro-details a more effectively, revealing nuances that are less apparent in AirPods 4 (6 vs 5). In complex arrangements, It separates layers a more distinctly, preventing overlap that AirPods 4 occasionally suffers (5.5 vs 5). It keeps competing frequencies under control a more effectively, reducing sonic congestion compared to AirPods 4 (6.5 vs 5). It adds m more body and density to musical notes, enriching the overall texture compared to AirPods 4 (7 vs 5). AirPods 4 delivers dynamic shifts with a greater impact, making Solo sound comparatively tame (5 vs 4.5). It controls harsh sibilant peaks a more effectively, making vocals smoother than on Solo (6.5 vs 3.5). Solo renders timbres with a better harmonic balance, preserving the character of instruments more accurately than AirPods 4 (7.5 vs 5.5). Tonality on It is d more coherent and refined, yielding a more pleasing overall signature than AirPods 4 (7 vs 5). Subtle ridges and granularity are conveyed e more clearly on It, adding life that AirPods 4 doesn’t quite match (5.5 vs 4.5).
| AirPods 4 | Solo | |
|---|---|---|
| Sub Bass | 4.5 | 5.5 |
| Bass | 5.5 | 6.0 |
| Bass Feel | 5.0 | 5.5 |
| Lower Mids | 5.5 | 7.5 |
| Upper Mids | 6.0 | 7.0 |
| Lower Treble | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Upper Treble | 6.5 | 5.5 |
| Sound Stage Width | 6.0 | 5.0 |
| Detail | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| Layering | 5.0 | 5.5 |
| Masking | 5.0 | 6.5 |
| Note Weight | 5.0 | 7.0 |
| Slam | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| Sibilance | 6.5 | 3.5 |
| Timbre Color | 5.5 | 7.5 |
| Tonality | 5.0 | 7.0 |
| Texture | 4.5 | 5.5 |
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.