AirPods 4vs.x Gizaudio DaVinci

Sound & Specs Comparison

Information

Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.

Objective Comparison

Facts, details, stuff.

Meta Ratings

From delicate instrumental textures to vocal nuances, x Gizaudio DaVinci conveys sound with distinctly enhanced finesse and resolution. For comfort fit, It performs measurably better (7 vs 5). Compared to AirPods 4, the overall accessory offering from It is overwhelmingly more aligned with the expectations of discerning audiophiles.

Sound Characteristics

x Gizaudio DaVinci delivers s deeper and more extended sub-bass, reaching lower frequencies with greater authority than AirPods 4 (7.3 vs 4.5). It offers s stronger and more impactful bass response, adding weight and presence where AirPods 4 feels less assertive (7.7 vs 5.5). It adds c more body and slam to bass hits, which makes it feel more physical than AirPods 4 (7.8 vs 5). It achieves d better warmth and coherence in the lower mids, bringing more realism to guitars and cellos (7.2 vs 5.5). It reproduces female vocals and strings with a more air and forwardness, while AirPods 4 remains recessed (6.8 vs 6). The upper treble of AirPods 4 extends a further, offering more sparkle and openness than x Gizaudio DaVinci (6.5 vs 5.8). x Gizaudio DaVinci extracts low-level details a more effectively, helping subtle nuances emerge clearer than on AirPods 4 (6 vs 5). Track elements feel a more isolated and clean on It, offering clearer focus than AirPods 4 (6.3 vs 5). Instruments remain intelligible on It even during busy sections, showing m better handling of masking than AirPods 4 (7 vs 5). It adds s more body and density to musical notes, enriching the overall texture compared to AirPods 4 (6.5 vs 5). Percussion and quick attacks feel s more physical and punchy on It, adding excitement over AirPods 4 (6.8 vs 5). Listeners may experience m fewer sharp edges in 'S' and 'T' sounds with AirPods 4, whereas x Gizaudio DaVinci can get fatiguing (6.5 vs 4.3). x Gizaudio DaVinci renders timbres with a better harmonic balance, preserving the character of instruments more accurately than AirPods 4 (7.8 vs 5.5). Across the frequency range, It stays a more consistent in tonal balance, resulting in a smoother listen than AirPods 4 (6.5 vs 5). The grain and surface of instruments are rendered m more vividly by It, while AirPods 4 feels flatter (6 vs 4.5).

Tonal Signature

// Nothing to compare yet.