Sound & Specs Comparison
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Facts, details, stuff.
General Info | Cantor | Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) |
---|---|---|
Brand | AFUL | AFUL |
Country | Taiwan | Taiwan |
IEM Description | The AFUL Cantor combines technical precision with musicality in a hybrid design. Featuring a dynamic driver for powerful bass and multiple balanced armatures for clean mids and sparkly highs, it delivers a spacious soundstage with excellent separation. Tuning leans slightly toward a balanced-bright signature, making it a solid choice for detail lovers who still want some low-end punch. | AFUL Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) delivers a dynamic and engaging listening experience with deep, controlled bass, clear mids, and airy treble. Its tuning strikes a balance between technical precision and musical enjoyment, making it a versatile choice for a wide range of genres. Crafted with precision acoustic design and a modern, ergonomic shell, it offers both comfort and performance in a sleek package. |
Price Level | 500 – 1.000 | 100 – 500 |
Housing & Driver | ||
---|---|---|
Driver Config | Multi-BA | Tribrid |
Driver Types | Balanced Armature | Micro Planar Tweeter + Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature |
Shell Material | – | – |
Cable | 4Braid 5N OFC Cable | – |
Technical | ||
---|---|---|
Freq Range | – | – |
Impedance (Ω) | 20 | – |
Sensitivity (dB) | 106 | – |
Crossover | RLC Network Electronic Crossover | – |
Platform Info | ||
---|---|---|
Comments | 2 | 1 |
Visit Count | 136 | 264 |
External Reviews | 1 | 1 |
// Nothing to compare yet.
Cantor produces sub-bass that is a more textured and present in cinematic or bass-heavy tracks (8.5 vs 5.5). It offers c stronger and more impactful bass response, adding weight and presence where Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) feels less assertive (9 vs 6.3). It adds a more body and slam to bass hits, which makes it feel more physical than Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) (8.5 vs 7). The lower midrange on It blends e more smoothly into the bass region, avoiding the disconnect found in Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) (8.5 vs 7.3). It offers n greater shimmer and nuance in the lower treble, revealing micro-details that Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) misses (8 vs 7). The stereo field on It feels a wider and more holographic, whereas Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) sounds more intimate (8 vs 7.5). It retrieves micro-details c more effectively, revealing nuances that are less apparent in Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) (8.8 vs 7.7). Track elements feel a more isolated and clean on It, offering clearer focus than Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) (8.3 vs 7.8). Notes on It feel a more grounded and weighty, whereas Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) can sound thin or hollow (7.5 vs 6.8). Percussion and quick attacks feel m more physical and punchy on It, adding excitement over Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) (8.5 vs 6.5). It controls harsh sibilant peaks a more effectively, making vocals smoother than on Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) (8.5 vs 5.5). The tone quality of It feels a more organic and true-to-source than the slightly artificial flavor of Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) (7.5 vs 7). Across the frequency range, It stays a more consistent in tonal balance, resulting in a smoother listen than Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) (8.8 vs 7.7). The grain and surface of instruments are rendered n more vividly by It, while Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) feels flatter (8 vs 6.8).
Cantor | Performer 5+2 (Performer 7) | |
---|---|---|
Sub Bass | 8.5 | 5.8 |
Bass | 9.0 | 6.7 |
Bass Feel | 8.5 | 7.0 |
Lower Mids | 8.5 | 7.3 |
Upper Mids | 8.0 | 7.5 |
Lower Treble | 8.0 | 6.4 |
Upper Treble | 7.5 | 7.8 |
Sound Stage Width | 8.0 | 7.0 |
Detail | 8.8 | 7.8 |
Layering | 8.3 | 7.8 |
Masking | 8.0 | 7.8 |
Note Weight | 7.5 | 6.8 |
Slam | 8.5 | 6.5 |
Sibilance | 8.5 | 5.5 |
Timbre Color | 7.5 | 7.0 |
Tonality | 8.8 | 7.7 |
Texture | 8.0 | 6.8 |
// Nothing to compare yet.