AVG. Rating
7.9
IEM AIEM B
VS
AVG. Rating
7.5

Cantorvs.x Crinacle DUSK

Sound & Specs Comparison

Change Focus:

82%
Cantor
Absolute Score: 82.3%
18%
x Crinacle DUSK
Absolute Score: 69.6%

Total categories compared: 17

Winner:Cantor

( leads by 142.4% in direct comparison by points delta )

Information

Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.

Objective Comparison

Facts, details, stuff.

General InfoCantorx Crinacle DUSK
BrandAFULMoondrop
CountryTaiwanChina
IEM DescriptionThe AFUL Cantor combines technical precision with musicality in a hybrid design. Featuring a dynamic driver for powerful bass and multiple balanced armatures for clean mids and sparkly highs, it delivers a spacious soundstage with excellent separation. Tuning leans slightly toward a balanced-bright signature, making it a solid choice for detail lovers who still want some low-end punch.MoonDrop × Crinacle DUSK is a highly acclaimed hybrid in-ear monitor co-developed with tuning expert Crinacle. It features a precise, neutral-bright tuning with a slight sub-bass lift, offering exceptional clarity, detail retrieval, and tonal balance. Known for its reference-grade performance, the DUSK is often considered one of the best IEMs under $1,000 and a benchmark in the audiophile community.
Price Level500 – 1.000100 – 500
Housing & Driver
Driver ConfigMulti-BATribrid
Driver TypesBalanced ArmaturePlanar Magnetic Driver + Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature
Shell MaterialResin
Cable4Braid 5N OFC Cable
Technical
Freq Range10Hz- 24kHz
Impedance (Ω)2014.5
Sensitivity (dB)106119
CrossoverRLC Network Electronic Crossover
Platform Info
Comments21
Visit Count132103
External Reviews11

Meta Ratings

// Nothing to compare yet.

Sound Characteristics

Cantor delivers m tighter sub-bass response, controlling low-end rumble with more precision than x Crinacle DUSK (8.5 vs 5.3). It enhances basslines with overwhelmingly more energy and grip, giving them a livelier feel compared to x Crinacle DUSK (9 vs 5). The bass in It feels a more physical and textured, with improved rumble and body compared to x Crinacle DUSK (8.5 vs 5.3). The lower midrange on It blends a more smoothly into the bass region, avoiding the disconnect found in x Crinacle DUSK (8.5 vs 5.8). It strikes a m better balance between presence and smoothness in the upper mids compared to x Crinacle DUSK (8 vs 6.5). It provides b more refined lower treble, resolving fine detail and air with greater finesse than x Crinacle DUSK (8 vs 7.3). The highest frequencies on x Crinacle DUSK feel a more natural and less rolled-off compared to Cantor (8.8 vs 7.5). The stereo field on Cantor feels a wider and more holographic, whereas x Crinacle DUSK sounds more intimate (8 vs 6.8). It extracts low-level details a more effectively, helping subtle nuances emerge clearer than on x Crinacle DUSK (8.8 vs 7). It separates instruments a more distinctly, helping complex passages remain coherent where x Crinacle DUSK blends them (8.3 vs 7.3). It avoids frequency masking a more successfully, preserving clarity across the spectrum better than x Crinacle DUSK (8 vs 6.3). It adds a more body and density to musical notes, enriching the overall texture compared to x Crinacle DUSK (7.5 vs 6.5). It delivers dynamic shifts with a greater impact, making x Crinacle DUSK sound comparatively tame (8.5 vs 6.8). x Crinacle DUSK renders timbres with a better harmonic balance, preserving the character of instruments more accurately than Cantor (8.5 vs 7.5).

Cantorx Crinacle DUSK
Sub Bass
8.5
5.3
Bass
9.0
5.0
Bass Feel
8.5
5.3
Lower Mids
8.5
5.8
Upper Mids
8.0
6.5
Lower Treble
8.0
7.3
Upper Treble
7.5
8.8
Sound Stage Width
8.0
6.8
Detail
8.8
7.0
Layering
8.3
7.3
Masking
8.0
6.3
Note Weight
7.5
6.5
Slam
8.5
6.8
Sibilance
8.5
8.3
Timbre Color
7.5
8.5
Tonality
8.8
8.5
Texture
8.0
8.3

Tonal Signature

// Nothing to compare yet.