Cantorvs.x Gizaudio DaVinci
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | Cantor | x Gizaudio DaVinci |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | AFUL | DUNU |
| Country | Taiwan | China |
| IEM Description | The AFUL Cantor combines technical precision with musicality in a hybrid design. Featuring a dynamic driver for powerful bass and multiple balanced armatures for clean mids and sparkly highs, it delivers a spacious soundstage with excellent separation. Tuning leans slightly toward a balanced-bright signature, making it a solid choice for detail lovers who still want some low-end punch. | The DUNU x Gizaudio DaVinci is a 6-driver hybrid IEM (2DD+4BA) with a rich, warm tuning and powerful sub-bass. It offers a musical, slightly U-shaped sound signature with lush mids and smooth treble. Each unit features a unique stabilized wood faceplate and premium build quality. |
| Price Level | 500 – 1.000 | n/a |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | Multi-BA | Hybrid |
| Driver Types | Balanced Armature | Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature |
| Shell Material | – | – |
| Cable | 4Braid 5N OFC Cable | – |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | – | – |
| Impedance (Ω) | 20 | – |
| Sensitivity (dB) | 106 | – |
| Crossover | RLC Network Electronic Crossover | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 2 | 0 |
| Visit Count | 138 | 36 |
| External Reviews | 1 | 0 |
Meta Ratings
// Nothing to compare yet.
Sound Characteristics
Cantor delivers a tighter sub-bass response, controlling low-end rumble with more precision than x Gizaudio DaVinci (8.5 vs 7.3). It enhances basslines with a more energy and grip, giving them a livelier feel compared to x Gizaudio DaVinci (9 vs 7.7). Listeners may find the low-end impact on It a more engaging during high-dynamic passages (8.5 vs 7.8). It achieves a better warmth and coherence in the lower mids, bringing more realism to guitars and cellos (8.5 vs 7.2). Upper mids are n more resolving and expressive on It, revealing emotion and articulation better than x Gizaudio DaVinci (8 vs 6.8). It provides a more refined lower treble, resolving fine detail and air with greater finesse than x Gizaudio DaVinci (8 vs 6.3). The upper treble of It extends a further, offering more sparkle and openness than x Gizaudio DaVinci (7.5 vs 5.8). The stereo field on It feels a wider and more holographic, whereas x Gizaudio DaVinci sounds more intimate (8 vs 6.2). With a higher resolution, It allows finer textures and room ambiance to shine more than x Gizaudio DaVinci (8.8 vs 6). It organizes musical elements a better across depth, enhancing spatial realism over x Gizaudio DaVinci (8.3 vs 6.3). Instruments remain intelligible on It even during busy sections, showing e better handling of masking than x Gizaudio DaVinci (8 vs 7). The note presentation is c fuller and more tactile on It, giving instruments a stronger physical presence than x Gizaudio DaVinci (7.5 vs 6.5). Percussion and quick attacks feel a more physical and punchy on It, adding excitement over x Gizaudio DaVinci (8.5 vs 6.8). Listeners may experience overwhelmingly fewer sharp edges in 'S' and 'T' sounds with It, whereas x Gizaudio DaVinci can get fatiguing (8.5 vs 4.3). It achieves m better tonal neutrality, avoiding colorations present in x Gizaudio DaVinci (8.8 vs 6.5). It renders texture a more precisely, making instrument surfaces and vocal grain more palpable than x Gizaudio DaVinci (8 vs 6).
| Cantor | x Gizaudio DaVinci | |
|---|---|---|
| Sub Bass | 8.5 | 7.5 |
| Bass | 9.0 | 7.8 |
| Bass Feel | 8.5 | 7.9 |
| Lower Mids | 8.5 | 7.3 |
| Upper Mids | 8.0 | 7.0 |
| Lower Treble | 8.0 | 6.7 |
| Upper Treble | 7.5 | 6.3 |
| Sound Stage Width | 8.0 | 6.5 |
| Detail | 8.8 | 6.4 |
| Layering | 8.3 | 6.5 |
| Masking | 8.0 | 7.0 |
| Note Weight | 7.5 | 6.5 |
| Slam | 8.5 | 6.8 |
| Sibilance | 8.5 | 4.3 |
| Timbre Color | 7.5 | 7.8 |
| Tonality | 8.8 | 6.5 |
| Texture | 8.0 | 6.0 |
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.