Giantvs.Meister
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | Giant | Meister |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Symphonium | Vision Ears |
| Country | Netherlands | Germany |
| IEM Description | – | – |
| Price Level | 500 – 1.000 | n/a |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | – | – |
| Driver Types | – | – |
| Shell Material | – | – |
| Cable | – | – |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | – | – |
| Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
| Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
| Crossover | – | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 0 | 0 |
| Visit Count | 18 | 16 |
| External Reviews | 0 | 0 |
Meta Ratings
// Nothing to compare yet.
Sound Characteristics
The lower midrange on Giant blends a more smoothly into the bass region, avoiding the disconnect found in Meister (8 vs 7.5). Upper mids are a more resolving and expressive on It, revealing emotion and articulation better than Meister (8 vs 7.5). Listeners may notice that Meister presents sounds with a more lateral space, giving recordings more openness than Giant (8.5 vs 7.5). It extracts low-level details a more effectively, helping subtle nuances emerge clearer than on Giant (8.5 vs 7.5). Track elements feel a more isolated and clean on It, offering clearer focus than Giant (8 vs 7.5).
| Giant | Meister | |
|---|---|---|
| Sub Bass | 7.5 | 7.3 |
| Bass | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| Bass Feel | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| Lower Mids | 8.0 | 7.5 |
| Upper Mids | 8.0 | 7.5 |
| Lower Treble | 7.5 | 7.3 |
| Upper Treble | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| Sound Stage Width | 7.5 | 8.5 |
| Detail | 7.5 | 8.5 |
| Layering | 7.5 | 8.0 |
| Masking | 7.5 | – |
| Note Weight | 7.0 | – |
| Slam | – | – |
| Sibilance | – | – |
| Timbre Color | – | – |
| Tonality | – | – |
| Texture | – | 8.3 |
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.