IER-Z1Rvs.Mk12 Turris
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | IER-Z1R | Mk12 Turris |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Sony | Hidizs |
| Country | – | – |
| IEM Description | Despite their small size, the Sony IER-Z1R earphones feature a sophisticated 3-way design with two dynamic drivers and a highly precise balanced armature. The sound quality is not just high-resolution—it's ultra-high-resolution, reaching an impressive frequency response of up to 100 kHz. Housed in a precisely crafted, virtually resonance-free aluminum shell, the design ensures that all three drivers remain in perfect phase alignment. The cables are fully balanced and made from high-purity OFC copper with silver plating for maximum detail retrieval. | The MK12 Turris brings a striking design together with a smooth and full-bodied sound. It’s an all-rounder that aims to please a broad range of musical tastes while offering style and substance in equal measure. |
| Price Level | 2.000 + | 100 – 500 |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | Hybrid | Single Dyn. Driver |
| Driver Types | Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature | Dynamic Driver |
| Shell Material | – | – |
| Cable | – | – |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | 3-100.000 Hz | 10-45kHz |
| Impedance (Ω) | – | 32 |
| Sensitivity (dB) | 103 | 111 |
| Crossover | – | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 0 | 1 |
| Visit Count | 93 | 13 |
| External Reviews | 1 | 1 |
Meta Ratings
From delicate instrumental textures to vocal nuances, IER-Z1R conveys sound with distinctly enhanced finesse and resolution. For comfort fit, Mk12 Turris performs faintly better (7.3 vs 6.8). IER-Z1R shows measurably superior build quality than Mk12 Turris (9.8 vs 7.5), indicating better materials, construction precision, and overall durability. The stock cable of It is considerably higher in quality (8.5 vs 4.8), offering improvements in flexibility, tactile feedback, and resistance to microphonics. It’s bundled components feel substantially more premium, suggesting a stronger focus on user satisfaction and long-term value.
| IER-Z1R | Mk12 Turris | |
|---|---|---|
| Sound | 9.8 | 7.8 |
| Comfort Fit | 6.8 | 7.3 |
| Build Quality | 9.8 | 7.5 |
| Stock Cable | 8.5 | 4.8 |
| Accessories | 8.3 | 5.0 |
Sound Characteristics
IER-Z1R produces sub-bass that is a more textured and present in cinematic or bass-heavy tracks (9 vs 8.5). It renders bass with a greater punch and separation, where Mk12 Turris sometimes feels bloated (9 vs 8). It translates bass vibrations into a a more visceral experience, while Mk12 Turris lacks this tactile feedback (9 vs 8.5). The lower midrange on Mk12 Turris blends a more smoothly into the bass region, avoiding the disconnect found in IER-Z1R (9 vs 8.5). IER-Z1R reproduces female vocals and strings with s more air and forwardness, while Mk12 Turris remains recessed (8.5 vs 8). It captures ambient cues and reverbs a more precisely through its upper treble, enhancing spatial perception over Mk12 Turris (9.5 vs 9). It paints a m broader sonic landscape, offering better instrument positioning across the stage (10 vs 8). It retrieves micro-details e more effectively, revealing nuances that are less apparent in Mk12 Turris (9.5 vs 8.5). In complex arrangements, It separates layers c more distinctly, preventing overlap that Mk12 Turris occasionally suffers (9.5 vs 8.5). It keeps competing frequencies under control a more effectively, reducing sonic congestion compared to Mk12 Turris (9 vs 8.5). It adds b more body and density to musical notes, enriching the overall texture compared to Mk12 Turris (9 vs 8.5). It delivers dynamic shifts with a greater impact, making Mk12 Turris sound comparatively tame (9 vs 7.5). It renders timbres with a better harmonic balance, preserving the character of instruments more accurately than Mk12 Turris (9.5 vs 8.5). It achieves a better tonal neutrality, avoiding colorations present in Mk12 Turris (9 vs 8.5). The grain and surface of instruments are rendered n more vividly by It, while Mk12 Turris feels flatter (9 vs 8).
| IER-Z1R | Mk12 Turris | |
|---|---|---|
| Sub Bass | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Bass | 9.0 | 8.0 |
| Bass Feel | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Lower Mids | 8.5 | 9.0 |
| Upper Mids | 8.5 | 8.0 |
| Lower Treble | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Upper Treble | 9.5 | 9.0 |
| Sound Stage Width | 10.0 | 8.0 |
| Detail | 9.5 | 8.5 |
| Layering | 9.5 | 8.5 |
| Masking | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Note Weight | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Slam | 9.0 | 7.5 |
| Sibilance | 9.5 | 9.5 |
| Timbre Color | 9.5 | 8.5 |
| Tonality | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Texture | 9.0 | 8.0 |
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.