IER-Z1Rvs.ZS10 Pro 2
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | IER-Z1R | ZS10 Pro 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Sony | KZ Earphones |
| Country | – | China |
| IEM Description | Despite their small size, the Sony IER-Z1R earphones feature a sophisticated 3-way design with two dynamic drivers and a highly precise balanced armature. The sound quality is not just high-resolution—it's ultra-high-resolution, reaching an impressive frequency response of up to 100 kHz. Housed in a precisely crafted, virtually resonance-free aluminum shell, the design ensures that all three drivers remain in perfect phase alignment. The cables are fully balanced and made from high-purity OFC copper with silver plating for maximum detail retrieval. | – |
| Price Level | 2.000 + | < 100 |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Driver Types | Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature | Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature |
| Shell Material | – | – |
| Cable | – | – |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | 3-100.000 Hz | – |
| Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
| Sensitivity (dB) | 103 | – |
| Crossover | – | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 0 | 0 |
| Visit Count | 97 | 24 |
| External Reviews | 1 | 0 |
Meta Ratings
From delicate instrumental textures to vocal nuances, IER-Z1R conveys sound with measurably enhanced finesse and resolution. For comfort fit, ZS10 Pro 2 performs markedly better (8.5 vs 6.8). From the connector housings to the shell seams, IER-Z1R demonstrates markedly tighter tolerances and higher production standards. Compared to ZS10 Pro 2, It’s cable exhibits materially smoother handling, with fewer instances of memory or stiffness. Regarding included accessories, It offers a notably more complete and useful package, which may include additional tips, a better case, or enhanced extras.
| IER-Z1R | ZS10 Pro 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sound | 9.8 | 7.5 |
| Comfort Fit | 6.8 | 8.5 |
| Build Quality | 9.8 | 8.0 |
| Stock Cable | 8.5 | 5.5 |
| Accessories | 8.3 | 5.0 |
Sound Characteristics
Low-frequency extension on IER-Z1R feels overwhelmingly more natural and authoritative, while ZS10 Pro 2 lacks some reach (9 vs 5). The low-end on It is a more controlled and rhythmic, offering better definition than ZS10 Pro 2 (9 vs 8.5). The lower midrange on It blends e more smoothly into the bass region, avoiding the disconnect found in ZS10 Pro 2 (8.5 vs 7.5). It reproduces female vocals and strings with c more air and forwardness, while ZS10 Pro 2 remains recessed (8.5 vs 7.5). It offers b greater shimmer and nuance in the lower treble, revealing micro-details that ZS10 Pro 2 misses (9 vs 8.5). The upper treble of It extends m further, offering more sparkle and openness than ZS10 Pro 2 (9.5 vs 8). It paints a s broader sonic landscape, offering better instrument positioning across the stage (10 vs 6.5). With d higher resolution, It allows finer textures and room ambiance to shine more than ZS10 Pro 2 (9.5 vs 8). Track elements feel a more isolated and clean on It, offering clearer focus than ZS10 Pro 2 (9.5 vs 9). It shows a better control of masking effects, maintaining clarity across frequency ranges better than ZS10 Pro 2 (9 vs 8). Notes on It feel c more grounded and weighty, whereas ZS10 Pro 2 can sound thin or hollow (9 vs 8). It hits with s more authority during transients, creating a more explosive effect than ZS10 Pro 2 (9 vs 8.5). It controls harsh sibilant peaks overwhelmingly more effectively, making vocals smoother than on ZS10 Pro 2 (9.5 vs 5). The tone quality of It feels overwhelmingly more organic and true-to-source than the slightly artificial flavor of ZS10 Pro 2 (9.5 vs 5). The overall tonality of It is overwhelmingly more balanced and cohesive, offering a sound signature that feels better tuned than ZS10 Pro 2 (9 vs 5). It renders texture a more precisely, making instrument surfaces and vocal grain more palpable than ZS10 Pro 2 (9 vs 8.5).
| IER-Z1R | ZS10 Pro 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sub Bass | 9.0 | 5.0 |
| Bass | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Bass Feel | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Lower Mids | 8.5 | 7.5 |
| Upper Mids | 8.5 | 7.5 |
| Lower Treble | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Upper Treble | 9.5 | 8.0 |
| Sound Stage Width | 10.0 | 6.5 |
| Detail | 9.5 | 8.0 |
| Layering | 9.5 | 9.0 |
| Masking | 9.0 | 8.0 |
| Note Weight | 9.0 | 8.0 |
| Slam | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Sibilance | 9.5 | 5.0 |
| Timbre Color | 9.5 | 5.0 |
| Tonality | 9.0 | 5.0 |
| Texture | 9.0 | 8.5 |
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.