Isabellaevs.Mk12 Turris

Sound & Specs Comparison

Information

Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.

Objective Comparison

Facts, details, stuff.

Meta Ratings

Mk12 Turris delivers noticeably better sound reproduction, offering a more immersive and engaging experience overall. Its tonal balance, clarity, and spatial imaging stand out clearly compared to Isabellae (7.8 vs 6.5). For comfort fit, Isabellae performs softly better (7.8 vs 7.3). The tactile feel and solidity of Mk12 Turris suggest evidently greater robustness and longevity compared to the more fragile impression left by Isabellae. Cable-wise, Isabellae is markedly better built, featuring sturdier connectors and less tangling — traits where Mk12 Turris falls slightly short. It's accessories are clearly better curated, reflecting greater attention to usability, presentation, and value-added content compared to Mk12 Turris.

Sound Characteristics

Mk12 Turris delivers a tighter sub-bass response, controlling low-end rumble with more precision than Isabellae (8.5 vs 5.8). The low-end on It is a more controlled and rhythmic, offering better definition than Isabellae (8 vs 6.5). It adds c more body and slam to bass hits, which makes it feel more physical than Isabellae (8.5 vs 6). It renders lower mids n more naturally, giving male vocals and instruments a fuller tone than Isabellae (9 vs 6.5). Upper mids are c more resolving and expressive on It, revealing emotion and articulation better than Isabellae (8 vs 6.8). The treble on It is a more nuanced and refined, especially when it comes to cymbals and ambient elements (9 vs 6.5). The upper treble of It extends s further, offering more sparkle and openness than Isabellae (9 vs 7). It creates a a wider soundstage, giving instruments more space and a better sense of placement than Isabellae (8 vs 6.8). It extracts low-level details c more effectively, helping subtle nuances emerge clearer than on Isabellae (8.5 vs 6). Track elements feel a more isolated and clean on It, offering clearer focus than Isabellae (8.5 vs 6.3). It avoids frequency masking a more successfully, preserving clarity across the spectrum better than Isabellae (8.5 vs 5.5). The note presentation is d fuller and more tactile on It, giving instruments a stronger physical presence than Isabellae (8.5 vs 6.5). It delivers dynamic shifts with m greater impact, making Isabellae sound comparatively tame (7.5 vs 6). It handles sibilant sounds overwhelmingly more gently, with fewer peaks and less sharpness than Isabellae (9.5 vs 3.3). Timbre on It sounds a more realistic and natural, whereas Isabellae feels slightly more artificial or colored (8.5 vs 6.3). It achieves m better tonal neutrality, avoiding colorations present in Isabellae (8.5 vs 6.5). It renders texture s more precisely, making instrument surfaces and vocal grain more palpable than Isabellae (8 vs 6).

Tonal Signature

// Nothing to compare yet.