Sound & Specs Comparison
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Facts, details, stuff.
General Info | Mk12 Turris | PRX |
---|---|---|
Brand | Hidizs | KZ Earphones |
Country | – | China |
IEM Description | The MK12 Turris brings a striking design together with a smooth and full-bodied sound. It’s an all-rounder that aims to please a broad range of musical tastes while offering style and substance in equal measure. | The KZ PRX is the brand’s first true fourth‑generation planar‑diaphragm IEM, engineered around a 14‑magnet matrix and an ultra‑thin, silver‑galvanized membrane for unparalleled high‑ and ultra‑high‑frequency extension (up to 40 kHz) with minimal distortion. Housed in a rugged alloy shell and paired with a detachable silver‑plated OFC cable and memory‑foam tips, it delivers precision tuning, a wide soundstage, and lasting comfort. Ergonomic curves and eco‑friendly packaging underscore KZ’s commitment to both craftsmanship and sustainability. |
Price Level | 100 – 500 | < 100 |
Housing & Driver | ||
---|---|---|
Driver Config | Single Dyn. Driver | Planar Magnetic |
Driver Types | Dynamic Driver | Planar Magnetic Driver |
Shell Material | – | – |
Cable | – | – |
Technical | ||
---|---|---|
Freq Range | 10-45kHz | – |
Impedance (Ω) | 32 | – |
Sensitivity (dB) | 111 | – |
Crossover | – | – |
Platform Info | ||
---|---|---|
Comments | 1 | 0 |
Visit Count | 19 | 82 |
External Reviews | 1 | 1 |
PRX delivers markedly better sound reproduction, offering a more immersive and engaging experience overall. Its tonal balance, clarity, and spatial imaging stand out clearly compared to Mk12 Turris (10 vs 7.8). For comfort fit, It performs faintly better (8 vs 7.3). The structural integrity of It is barely more convincing, delivering a sense of refinement and premium craftsmanship that Mk12 Turris struggles to match. It’s bundled components feel barely more premium, suggesting a stronger focus on user satisfaction and long-term value.
Mk12 Turris | PRX | |
---|---|---|
Sound | 7.8 | 10.0 |
Comfort Fit | 7.3 | 8.0 |
Build Quality | 7.5 | 8.0 |
Stock Cable | 4.8 | 5.0 |
Accessories | 5.0 | 5.5 |
Mk12 Turris produces sub-bass that is n more textured and present in cinematic or bass-heavy tracks (8.5 vs 6). The low-end on It is d more controlled and rhythmic, offering better definition than PRX (8 vs 6.5). Listeners may find the low-end impact on It n more engaging during high-dynamic passages (8.5 vs 6). The lower midrange on It blends m more smoothly into the bass region, avoiding the disconnect found in PRX (9 vs 7). Upper mids are a more resolving and expressive on It, revealing emotion and articulation better than PRX (8 vs 7.5). Instruments like violins and brass are portrayed with b more brilliance on It, while PRX sounds slightly dull (9 vs 8.5). The highest frequencies on It feel b more natural and less rolled-off compared to PRX (9 vs 8.5). In complex arrangements, It separates layers a more distinctly, preventing overlap that PRX occasionally suffers (8.5 vs 8). It avoids frequency masking a more successfully, preserving clarity across the spectrum better than PRX (8.5 vs 8). Notes played through It feel a weightier and fuller, giving a more satisfying impact than those from PRX (8.5 vs 6.5). It delivers a stronger slam and physicality, making drums and transients hit harder than PRX (7.5 vs 7). The upper range of vocals is a cleaner and more forgiving on It, helping it avoid sibilant harshness that PRX shows (9.5 vs 7.5). It presents instrument timbre with a more natural coloration, giving a realistic tone that PRX lacks (8.5 vs 6). It achieves n better tonal neutrality, avoiding colorations present in PRX (8.5 vs 6). Subtle ridges and granularity are conveyed a more clearly on It, adding life that PRX doesn’t quite match (8 vs 7).
Mk12 Turris | PRX | |
---|---|---|
Sub Bass | 8.5 | 6.0 |
Bass | 8.0 | 6.5 |
Bass Feel | 8.5 | 6.0 |
Lower Mids | 9.0 | 7.0 |
Upper Mids | 8.0 | 7.5 |
Lower Treble | 9.0 | 8.5 |
Upper Treble | 9.0 | 8.5 |
Sound Stage Width | 8.0 | 8.0 |
Detail | 8.5 | 8.5 |
Layering | 8.5 | 8.0 |
Masking | 8.5 | 8.0 |
Note Weight | 8.5 | 6.5 |
Slam | 7.5 | 7.0 |
Sibilance | 9.5 | 7.5 |
Timbre Color | 8.5 | 6.0 |
Tonality | 8.5 | 6.0 |
Texture | 8.0 | 7.0 |
// Nothing to compare yet.