Mk12 Turrisvs.ZS10 Pro 2

Sound & Specs Comparison

Information

Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.

Objective Comparison

Facts, details, stuff.

Meta Ratings

For comfort fit, ZS10 Pro 2 performs noticeably better (8.5 vs 7.3). The structural integrity of It is faintly more convincing, delivering a sense of refinement and premium craftsmanship that Mk12 Turris struggles to match. It’s cable appears faintly more premium in both aesthetics and function, from its braid quality to termination.

Sound Characteristics

Mk12 Turris produces sub-bass that is a more textured and present in cinematic or bass-heavy tracks (8.5 vs 5). ZS10 Pro 2 offers a stronger and more impactful bass response, adding weight and presence where Mk12 Turris feels less assertive (8.5 vs 8). The bass in It feels a more physical and textured, with improved rumble and body compared to Mk12 Turris (9 vs 8.5). Mk12 Turris achieves a better warmth and coherence in the lower mids, bringing more realism to guitars and cellos (9 vs 7.5). Upper mids are s more resolving and expressive on It, revealing emotion and articulation better than ZS10 Pro 2 (8 vs 7.5). It offers a greater shimmer and nuance in the lower treble, revealing micro-details that ZS10 Pro 2 misses (9 vs 8.5). It extends e further into the upper treble, adding air and openness that ZS10 Pro 2 lacks (9 vs 8). It paints a a broader sonic landscape, offering better instrument positioning across the stage (8 vs 6.5). It retrieves micro-details a more effectively, revealing nuances that are less apparent in ZS10 Pro 2 (8.5 vs 8). Track elements feel s more isolated and clean on ZS10 Pro 2, offering clearer focus than Mk12 Turris (9 vs 8.5). Mk12 Turris keeps competing frequencies under control a more effectively, reducing sonic congestion compared to ZS10 Pro 2 (8.5 vs 8). Notes on It feel a more grounded and weighty, whereas ZS10 Pro 2 can sound thin or hollow (8.5 vs 8). ZS10 Pro 2 hits with a more authority during transients, creating a more explosive effect than Mk12 Turris (8.5 vs 7.5). Mk12 Turris handles sibilant sounds overwhelmingly more gently, with fewer peaks and less sharpness than ZS10 Pro 2 (9.5 vs 5). Timbre on It sounds n more realistic and natural, whereas ZS10 Pro 2 feels slightly more artificial or colored (8.5 vs 5). Tonality on It is n more coherent and refined, yielding a more pleasing overall signature than ZS10 Pro 2 (8.5 vs 5). ZS10 Pro 2 portrays textures in vocals and strings with a more realism, enhancing emotional depth over Mk12 Turris (8.5 vs 8).

Tonal Signature

// Nothing to compare yet.