AVG. Rating
4.0
IEM AIEM B
VS
AVG. Rating
7.1

Gatevs.Nova

Sound & Specs Comparison

Change Focus:

34%
Gate
Absolute Score: 47.8%
66%
Nova
Absolute Score: 45.0%

Total categories compared: 29

Winner:Nova

( leads by 151.7% in direct comparison by points delta )

Information

Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.

Objective Comparison

Facts, details, stuff.

General InfoGateNova
BrandTruthearTruthear
CountryChinaChina
IEM Description
Price Level< 100100 – 500
Housing & Driver
Driver ConfigSingle Dyn. DriverHybrid
Driver TypesDynamic DriverDynamic Driver + Balanced Armature
Shell Material
Cable
Technical
Freq Range
Impedance (Ω)
Sensitivity (dB)
Crossover
Platform Info
Comments10
Visit Count3111
External Reviews00

Meta Ratings

Sound-wise, Nova provides a considerably more refined presentation, with improved detail retrieval, microdynamics, and instrument layering when compared to Gate (7 vs 4).

Sound
Comfort Fit
Build Quality
Stock Cable
Accessories
GateNova
Sound
4.0
7.0
Comfort Fit
7.5
Build Quality
5.5
Stock Cable
5.0
Accessories
4.5

Sound Characteristics

Nova produces sub-bass that is c more textured and present in cinematic or bass-heavy tracks (7 vs 4.5). It enhances basslines with m more energy and grip, giving them a livelier feel compared to Gate (7 vs 5). It translates bass vibrations into a s more visceral experience, while Gate lacks this tactile feedback (7 vs 4.5). Male vocals and lower instruments sound a richer and better defined on It, unlike Gate which can seem hollow (7 vs 5). Upper mids are a more resolving and expressive on It, revealing emotion and articulation better than Gate (7 vs 6). The treble on It is a more nuanced and refined, especially when it comes to cymbals and ambient elements (7 vs 5.5). It extends a further into the upper treble, adding air and openness that Gate lacks (6.5 vs 5). The stereo field on It feels d wider and more holographic, whereas Gate sounds more intimate (6.5 vs 5). It extracts low-level details c more effectively, helping subtle nuances emerge clearer than on Gate (7 vs 4.5). It organizes musical elements a better across depth, enhancing spatial realism over Gate (6.5 vs 4.5). It shows n better control of masking effects, maintaining clarity across frequency ranges better than Gate (7 vs 4.5). Notes on It feel m more grounded and weighty, whereas Gate can sound thin or hollow (7 vs 5). Percussion and quick attacks feel a more physical and punchy on It, adding excitement over Gate (6 vs 4). Across the frequency range, It stays s more consistent in tonal balance, resulting in a smoother listen than Gate (7 vs 3.5).

GateNova
Sub Bass
4.5
7.0
Bass
5.0
7.0
Bass Feel
4.5
7.0
Lower Mids
5.0
7.0
Upper Mids
6.0
7.0
Lower Treble
5.5
7.0
Upper Treble
5.0
6.5
Sound Stage Width
5.0
6.5
Detail
4.5
7.0
Layering
4.5
6.5
Masking
4.5
7.0
Note Weight
5.0
7.0
Slam
4.0
6.0
Sibilance
3.5
Timbre Color
4.0
Tonality
3.5
7.0
Texture
3.5

Tonal Signature

// Nothing to compare yet.