Project Metavs.ZAS– Sound & Specs Comparison
Comparison Summary:
Project Meta (97% wins)
Absolute Score: 63.6%
ZAS (3% wins)
Absolute Score: 49.5%
Total categories compared: 29
Winner: Project Meta ( leads by 143.1% in direct comparison by points delta )
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
This is currently in development. There will be more to come very soon.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| Attribute | Project Meta | ZAS |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | CrinEar | KZ Earphones |
| Country | – | China |
| IEM Description | A debut IEM by Crinacle's CrinEar: a compact, full-aluminum flagship tuned to a “tilted Diffuse Field + bass boost” curve. Delivers vibrant mids, warm sub-bass, and clear treble—crafted for musical accuracy and comfort. | – |
| Price Level | 100 – 500 | < 100 |
| Driver Config | – | Hybrid |
| Driver Types | – | Balanced Armature + Dynamic Driver |
| Shell Material | – | Resin |
| Freq Range | – | – |
| Impedance (Ω) | – | 24 |
| Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
| Crossover | – | – |
| Cable | – | – |
| Comments | 0 | 0 |
| Visit Count | 85 | 22 |
| External Reviews | 1 | 0 |
Meta Ratings
| ATTRIBUTE | Project Meta | ZAS |
|---|---|---|
| Sound | 7.0 | 5.0 |
| Comfort Fit | 6.5 | 6.0 |
| Build Quality | 6.5 | 4.0 |
| Stock Cable | 6.5 | 4.0 |
| Accessories | 6.0 | 4.0 |
Sound Characteristics
| Characteristic | Project Meta | ZAS |
|---|---|---|
| Sub Bass | 6.0 | 4.5 |
| Bass | 6.0 | 5.0 |
| Bass Feel | 6.5 | 5.5 |
| Lower Mids | 6.5 | 5.0 |
| Upper Mids | 5.5 | 4.5 |
| Lower Treble | 7.5 | 5.0 |
| Upper Treble | 6.5 | 5.0 |
| Sound Stage Width | 6.0 | 5.5 |
| Detail | 6.0 | 5.5 |
| Layering | 6.5 | 5.5 |
| Masking | 5.5 | 6.0 |
| Note Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 |
| Slam | 6.0 | 4.5 |
| Sibilance | 6.5 | 5.5 |
| Timbre Color | 6.0 | 5.0 |
| Tonality | 6.0 | 5.0 |
| Texture | 5.5 | 4.5 |
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.