Sound & Specs Comparison
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Facts, details, stuff.
General Info | SA6 Mk2 | Variations |
---|---|---|
Brand | DUNU | Moondrop |
Country | China | China |
IEM Description | – | Moondrop Variations is a hybrid in-ear monitor combining electrostatic, balanced armature, and dynamic drivers for a precise and immersive listening experience. Known for its balanced, reference-style tuning with tight bass, clean mids, and extended treble, it’s a favorite among audiophiles who crave clarity and technical performance. Ideal for detail lovers and those seeking a high-fidelity sound signature. |
Price Level | 100 – 500 | 500 – 1.000 |
Housing & Driver | ||
---|---|---|
Driver Config | Multi-BA | Tribrid |
Driver Types | Balanced Armature | Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature + Electrostatic |
Shell Material | – | Copper |
Cable | – | – |
Technical | ||
---|---|---|
Freq Range | – | 9-40,000 Hz |
Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
Crossover | – | – |
Platform Info | ||
---|---|---|
Comments | 0 | 1 |
Visit Count | 128 | 69 |
External Reviews | 1 | 3 |
From delicate instrumental textures to vocal nuances, SA6 Mk2 conveys sound with markedly enhanced finesse and resolution. From the connector housings to the shell seams, It demonstrates evidently tighter tolerances and higher production standards. Cable-wise, It is markedly better built, featuring sturdier connectors and less tangling — traits where Variations falls slightly short. Compared to Variations, the overall accessory offering from It is slightly more aligned with the expectations of discerning audiophiles.
SA6 Mk2 | Variations | |
---|---|---|
Sound | 8.3 | 6.5 |
Comfort Fit | 6.9 | 7.0 |
Build Quality | 7.5 | 6.5 |
Stock Cable | 7.8 | 5.5 |
Accessories | 7.0 | 6.0 |
Variations produces sub-bass that is a more textured and present in cinematic or bass-heavy tracks (6.5 vs 6). SA6 Mk2 enhances basslines with b more energy and grip, giving them a livelier feel compared to Variations (7 vs 6.5). The bass in Variations feels b more physical and textured, with improved rumble and body compared to SA6 Mk2 (8.5 vs 8). It creates a a wider soundstage, giving instruments more space and a better sense of placement than SA6 Mk2 (7.5 vs 7). The retrieval of faint audio cues on It is a more convincing, while SA6 Mk2 tends to gloss over them (8 vs 7.3). Notes played through It feel b weightier and fuller, giving a more satisfying impact than those from SA6 Mk2 (8 vs 7.3). Percussion and quick attacks feel m more physical and punchy on It, adding excitement over SA6 Mk2 (8.5 vs 7). The upper range of vocals is m cleaner and more forgiving on It, helping it avoid sibilant harshness that SA6 Mk2 shows (9 vs 6.8). The tone quality of It feels a more organic and true-to-source than the slightly artificial flavor of SA6 Mk2 (7.5 vs 7). Tonality on SA6 Mk2 is s more coherent and refined, yielding a more pleasing overall signature than Variations (7.8 vs 7).
SA6 Mk2 | Variations | |
---|---|---|
Sub Bass | 6.0 | 6.5 |
Bass | 7.0 | 6.5 |
Bass Feel | 8.0 | 8.5 |
Lower Mids | 7.3 | 7.5 |
Upper Mids | 7.8 | 8.0 |
Lower Treble | 7.3 | 7.5 |
Upper Treble | 8.3 | 8.0 |
Sound Stage Width | 7.0 | 7.5 |
Detail | 7.3 | 8.0 |
Layering | 6.8 | 7.0 |
Masking | 7.0 | 7.0 |
Note Weight | 7.3 | 8.0 |
Slam | 7.0 | 8.5 |
Sibilance | 6.8 | 9.0 |
Timbre Color | 7.0 | 7.5 |
Tonality | 7.8 | 7.0 |
Texture | 7.3 | 7.5 |
// Nothing to compare yet.