Sound & Specs Comparison
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Facts, details, stuff.
General Info | SLIIVO SL224 | Variations |
---|---|---|
Brand | Myer Audio | Moondrop |
Country | – | China |
IEM Description | – | Moondrop Variations is a hybrid in-ear monitor combining electrostatic, balanced armature, and dynamic drivers for a precise and immersive listening experience. Known for its balanced, reference-style tuning with tight bass, clean mids, and extended treble, it’s a favorite among audiophiles who crave clarity and technical performance. Ideal for detail lovers and those seeking a high-fidelity sound signature. |
Price Level | 100 – 500 | 500 – 1.000 |
Housing & Driver | ||
---|---|---|
Driver Config | – | Tribrid |
Driver Types | – | Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature + Electrostatic |
Shell Material | – | Copper |
Cable | – | – |
Technical | ||
---|---|---|
Freq Range | – | 9-40,000 Hz |
Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
Crossover | – | – |
Platform Info | ||
---|---|---|
Comments | 0 | 1 |
Visit Count | 10 | 69 |
External Reviews | 0 | 3 |
Compared to Variations, SLIIVO SL224 creates a softly wider and deeper soundstage, giving each instrument more space and depth. For comfort fit, Variations performs faintly better (7 vs 6.5). The tactile feel and solidity of It suggest faintly greater robustness and longevity compared to the more fragile impression left by SLIIVO SL224. The included cable with It shows faintly better strain relief and physical resilience. From the case design to ear tip variety, It provides a clearly more thoughtful unboxing experience.
SLIIVO SL224 | Variations | |
---|---|---|
Sound | 7.0 | 6.5 |
Comfort Fit | 6.5 | 7.0 |
Build Quality | 6.0 | 6.5 |
Stock Cable | 5.0 | 5.5 |
Accessories | 5.0 | 6.0 |
Low-frequency extension on Variations feels a more natural and authoritative, while SLIIVO SL224 lacks some reach (6.5 vs 5.5). The low-end on It is a more controlled and rhythmic, offering better definition than SLIIVO SL224 (6.5 vs 6). It translates bass vibrations into a d more visceral experience, while SLIIVO SL224 lacks this tactile feedback (8.5 vs 6.5). Upper mids are b more resolving and expressive on It, revealing emotion and articulation better than SLIIVO SL224 (8 vs 7.5). It extends a further into the upper treble, adding air and openness that SLIIVO SL224 lacks (8 vs 7.5). The stereo field on It feels a wider and more holographic, whereas SLIIVO SL224 sounds more intimate (7.5 vs 7). The retrieval of faint audio cues on It is c more convincing, while SLIIVO SL224 tends to gloss over them (8 vs 7). In complex arrangements, It separates layers e more distinctly, preventing overlap that SLIIVO SL224 occasionally suffers (7 vs 6). Notes on It feel a more grounded and weighty, whereas SLIIVO SL224 can sound thin or hollow (8 vs 7). It hits with m more authority during transients, creating a more explosive effect than SLIIVO SL224 (8.5 vs 7). It controls harsh sibilant peaks n more effectively, making vocals smoother than on SLIIVO SL224 (9 vs 8). It presents instrument timbre with a more natural coloration, giving a realistic tone that SLIIVO SL224 lacks (7.5 vs 6.5). It achieves a better tonal neutrality, avoiding colorations present in SLIIVO SL224 (7 vs 6.5). It portrays textures in vocals and strings with a more realism, enhancing emotional depth over SLIIVO SL224 (7.5 vs 7).
SLIIVO SL224 | Variations | |
---|---|---|
Sub Bass | 5.5 | 6.5 |
Bass | 6.0 | 6.5 |
Bass Feel | 6.5 | 8.5 |
Lower Mids | 7.5 | 7.5 |
Upper Mids | 7.5 | 8.0 |
Lower Treble | 7.5 | 7.5 |
Upper Treble | 7.5 | 8.0 |
Sound Stage Width | 7.0 | 7.5 |
Detail | 7.0 | 8.0 |
Layering | 6.0 | 7.0 |
Masking | 7.0 | 7.0 |
Note Weight | 7.0 | 8.0 |
Slam | 7.0 | 8.5 |
Sibilance | 8.0 | 9.0 |
Timbre Color | 6.5 | 7.5 |
Tonality | 6.5 | 7.0 |
Texture | 7.0 | 7.5 |
// Nothing to compare yet.