Sound & Specs Comparison
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Facts, details, stuff.
General Info | Daybreak | Variations |
---|---|---|
Brand | CrinEar | Moondrop |
Country | – | China |
IEM Description | – | Moondrop Variations is a hybrid in-ear monitor combining electrostatic, balanced armature, and dynamic drivers for a precise and immersive listening experience. Known for its balanced, reference-style tuning with tight bass, clean mids, and extended treble, it’s a favorite among audiophiles who crave clarity and technical performance. Ideal for detail lovers and those seeking a high-fidelity sound signature. |
Price Level | 100 – 500 | 500 – 1.000 |
Housing & Driver | ||
---|---|---|
Driver Config | – | Tribrid |
Driver Types | – | Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature + Electrostatic |
Shell Material | Fully Filled Resin, Aluminium Nozzle | Copper |
Cable | – | – |
Technical | ||
---|---|---|
Freq Range | – | 9-40,000 Hz |
Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
Crossover | – | – |
Platform Info | ||
---|---|---|
Comments | 0 | 1 |
Visit Count | 135 | 81 |
External Reviews | 0 | 3 |
For comfort fit, Variations performs softly better (7 vs 6.5). From the connector housings to the shell seams, Daybreak demonstrates faintly tighter tolerances and higher production standards.
Daybreak | Variations | |
---|---|---|
Sound | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Comfort Fit | 6.5 | 7.0 |
Build Quality | 7.0 | 6.5 |
Stock Cable | – | 5.5 |
Accessories | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Low-frequency extension on Variations feels a more natural and authoritative, while Daybreak lacks some reach (6.5 vs 5.5). The low-end on It is b more controlled and rhythmic, offering better definition than Daybreak (6.5 vs 6). The bass in It feels a more physical and textured, with improved rumble and body compared to Daybreak (8.5 vs 6). It achieves m better warmth and coherence in the lower mids, bringing more realism to guitars and cellos (7.5 vs 6). It strikes a a better balance between presence and smoothness in the upper mids compared to Daybreak (8 vs 6.5). The treble on It is a more nuanced and refined, especially when it comes to cymbals and ambient elements (7.5 vs 6.5). The highest frequencies on It feel a more natural and less rolled-off compared to Daybreak (8 vs 7). The stereo field on It feels a wider and more holographic, whereas Daybreak sounds more intimate (7.5 vs 6). With s higher resolution, It allows finer textures and room ambiance to shine more than Daybreak (8 vs 6). Track elements feel a more isolated and clean on It, offering clearer focus than Daybreak (7 vs 6.5). Instruments remain intelligible on It even during busy sections, showing b better handling of masking than Daybreak (7 vs 6.5). Notes on It feel m more grounded and weighty, whereas Daybreak can sound thin or hollow (8 vs 6). It delivers dynamic shifts with c greater impact, making Daybreak sound comparatively tame (8.5 vs 5.5). It handles sibilant sounds m more gently, with fewer peaks and less sharpness than Daybreak (9 vs 6). It renders timbres with a better harmonic balance, preserving the character of instruments more accurately than Daybreak (7.5 vs 5). Across the frequency range, It stays m more consistent in tonal balance, resulting in a smoother listen than Daybreak (7 vs 5.5). Subtle ridges and granularity are conveyed m more clearly on It, adding life that Daybreak doesn’t quite match (7.5 vs 5).
Daybreak | Variations | |
---|---|---|
Sub Bass | 5.5 | 6.5 |
Bass | 6.0 | 6.5 |
Bass Feel | 6.0 | 8.5 |
Lower Mids | 6.0 | 7.5 |
Upper Mids | 6.5 | 8.0 |
Lower Treble | 6.5 | 7.5 |
Upper Treble | 7.0 | 8.0 |
Sound Stage Width | 6.0 | 7.5 |
Detail | 6.0 | 8.0 |
Layering | 6.5 | 7.0 |
Masking | 6.5 | 7.0 |
Note Weight | 6.0 | 8.0 |
Slam | 5.5 | 8.5 |
Sibilance | 6.0 | 9.0 |
Timbre Color | 5.0 | 7.5 |
Tonality | 5.5 | 7.0 |
Texture | 5.0 | 7.5 |
// Nothing to compare yet.