SA6 Mk2vs.Variations
Sound & Specs Comparison
Information
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Objective Comparison
Facts, details, stuff.
| General Info | SA6 Mk2 | Variations |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | DUNU | Moondrop |
| Country | China | China |
| IEM Description | – | Moondrop Variations is a hybrid in-ear monitor combining electrostatic, balanced armature, and dynamic drivers for a precise and immersive listening experience. Known for its balanced, reference-style tuning with tight bass, clean mids, and extended treble, it’s a favorite among audiophiles who crave clarity and technical performance. Ideal for detail lovers and those seeking a high-fidelity sound signature. |
| Price Level | 100 – 500 | 500 – 1.000 |
| Housing & Driver | ||
|---|---|---|
| Driver Config | Multi-BA | Tribrid |
| Driver Types | Balanced Armature | Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature + Electrostatic |
| Shell Material | – | Copper |
| Cable | – | – |
| Technical | ||
|---|---|---|
| Freq Range | – | 9-40,000 Hz |
| Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
| Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
| Crossover | – | – |
| Platform Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comments | 0 | 1 |
| Visit Count | 128 | 81 |
| External Reviews | 1 | 3 |
Meta Ratings
SA6 Mk2 delivers distinctly better sound reproduction, offering a more immersive and engaging experience overall. Its tonal balance, clarity, and spatial imaging stand out clearly compared to Variations (8.3 vs 6.5). It shows evidently superior build quality than Variations (7.5 vs 6.5), indicating better materials, construction precision, and overall durability. Users may find the It cable significantly more confidence-inspiring for both daily use and long-term durability. Accessory-wise, It includes faintly more practical and high-quality items, enhancing both protection and usability.
| SA6 Mk2 | Variations | |
|---|---|---|
| Sound | 8.3 | 6.5 |
| Comfort Fit | 6.9 | 7.0 |
| Build Quality | 7.5 | 6.5 |
| Stock Cable | 7.8 | 5.5 |
| Accessories | 7.0 | 6.0 |
Sound Characteristics
Variations produces sub-bass that is s more textured and present in cinematic or bass-heavy tracks (6.5 vs 6). The low-end on SA6 Mk2 is a more controlled and rhythmic, offering better definition than Variations (7 vs 6.5). Variations translates bass vibrations into a b more visceral experience, while SA6 Mk2 lacks this tactile feedback (8.5 vs 8). It paints a a broader sonic landscape, offering better instrument positioning across the stage (7.5 vs 7). The retrieval of faint audio cues on It is a more convincing, while SA6 Mk2 tends to gloss over them (8 vs 7.3). Notes on It feel a more grounded and weighty, whereas SA6 Mk2 can sound thin or hollow (8 vs 7.3). Percussion and quick attacks feel m more physical and punchy on It, adding excitement over SA6 Mk2 (8.5 vs 7). The upper range of vocals is a cleaner and more forgiving on It, helping it avoid sibilant harshness that SA6 Mk2 shows (9 vs 6.8). It renders timbres with s better harmonic balance, preserving the character of instruments more accurately than SA6 Mk2 (7.5 vs 7). The overall tonality of SA6 Mk2 is a more balanced and cohesive, offering a sound signature that feels better tuned than Variations (7.8 vs 7).
| SA6 Mk2 | Variations | |
|---|---|---|
| Sub Bass | 6.0 | 6.5 |
| Bass | 7.0 | 6.5 |
| Bass Feel | 8.0 | 8.5 |
| Lower Mids | 7.3 | 7.5 |
| Upper Mids | 7.8 | 8.0 |
| Lower Treble | 7.3 | 7.5 |
| Upper Treble | 8.3 | 8.0 |
| Sound Stage Width | 7.0 | 7.5 |
| Detail | 7.3 | 8.0 |
| Layering | 6.8 | 7.0 |
| Masking | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| Note Weight | 7.3 | 8.0 |
| Slam | 7.0 | 8.5 |
| Sibilance | 6.8 | 9.0 |
| Timbre Color | 7.0 | 7.5 |
| Tonality | 7.8 | 7.0 |
| Texture | 7.3 | 7.5 |
Tonal Signature
// Nothing to compare yet.