Sound & Specs Comparison
Both IEMs are widely regarded in the audiophile community. See how they differ in terms of sub-bass response, upper mids, clarity, and overall tonality. Spider charts and rating breakdowns included.
Facts, details, stuff.
General Info | SLIIVO SL224 | Variations |
---|---|---|
Brand | Myer Audio | Moondrop |
Country | – | China |
IEM Description | – | Moondrop Variations is a hybrid in-ear monitor combining electrostatic, balanced armature, and dynamic drivers for a precise and immersive listening experience. Known for its balanced, reference-style tuning with tight bass, clean mids, and extended treble, it’s a favorite among audiophiles who crave clarity and technical performance. Ideal for detail lovers and those seeking a high-fidelity sound signature. |
Price Level | 100 – 500 | 500 – 1.000 |
Housing & Driver | ||
---|---|---|
Driver Config | – | Tribrid |
Driver Types | – | Dynamic Driver + Balanced Armature + Electrostatic |
Shell Material | – | Copper |
Cable | – | – |
Technical | ||
---|---|---|
Freq Range | – | 9-40,000 Hz |
Impedance (Ω) | – | – |
Sensitivity (dB) | – | – |
Crossover | – | – |
Platform Info | ||
---|---|---|
Comments | 0 | 1 |
Visit Count | 16 | 81 |
External Reviews | 0 | 3 |
Especially for complex musical passages, SLIIVO SL224 handles layering and imaging subtly more confidently and precisely. For comfort fit, Variations performs subtly better (7 vs 6.5). The structural integrity of It is faintly more convincing, delivering a sense of refinement and premium craftsmanship that SLIIVO SL224 struggles to match. Users may find the It cable subtly more confidence-inspiring for both daily use and long-term durability. It’s bundled components feel readably more premium, suggesting a stronger focus on user satisfaction and long-term value.
SLIIVO SL224 | Variations | |
---|---|---|
Sound | 7.0 | 6.5 |
Comfort Fit | 6.5 | 7.0 |
Build Quality | 6.0 | 6.5 |
Stock Cable | 5.0 | 5.5 |
Accessories | 5.0 | 6.0 |
Variations delivers a tighter sub-bass response, controlling low-end rumble with more precision than SLIIVO SL224 (6.5 vs 5.5). It renders bass with b greater punch and separation, where SLIIVO SL224 sometimes feels bloated (6.5 vs 6). Listeners may find the low-end impact on It m more engaging during high-dynamic passages (8.5 vs 6.5). It reproduces female vocals and strings with a more air and forwardness, while SLIIVO SL224 remains recessed (8 vs 7.5). It extends a further into the upper treble, adding air and openness that SLIIVO SL224 lacks (8 vs 7.5). The stereo field on It feels a wider and more holographic, whereas SLIIVO SL224 sounds more intimate (7.5 vs 7). The retrieval of faint audio cues on It is a more convincing, while SLIIVO SL224 tends to gloss over them (8 vs 7). In complex arrangements, It separates layers e more distinctly, preventing overlap that SLIIVO SL224 occasionally suffers (7 vs 6). Notes on It feel a more grounded and weighty, whereas SLIIVO SL224 can sound thin or hollow (8 vs 7). Percussion and quick attacks feel m more physical and punchy on It, adding excitement over SLIIVO SL224 (8.5 vs 7). The upper range of vocals is a cleaner and more forgiving on It, helping it avoid sibilant harshness that SLIIVO SL224 shows (9 vs 8). It presents instrument timbre with a more natural coloration, giving a realistic tone that SLIIVO SL224 lacks (7.5 vs 6.5). It achieves a better tonal neutrality, avoiding colorations present in SLIIVO SL224 (7 vs 6.5). It renders texture a more precisely, making instrument surfaces and vocal grain more palpable than SLIIVO SL224 (7.5 vs 7).
SLIIVO SL224 | Variations | |
---|---|---|
Sub Bass | 5.5 | 6.5 |
Bass | 6.0 | 6.5 |
Bass Feel | 6.5 | 8.5 |
Lower Mids | 7.5 | 7.5 |
Upper Mids | 7.5 | 8.0 |
Lower Treble | 7.5 | 7.5 |
Upper Treble | 7.5 | 8.0 |
Sound Stage Width | 7.0 | 7.5 |
Detail | 7.0 | 8.0 |
Layering | 6.0 | 7.0 |
Masking | 7.0 | 7.0 |
Note Weight | 7.0 | 8.0 |
Slam | 7.0 | 8.5 |
Sibilance | 8.0 | 9.0 |
Timbre Color | 6.5 | 7.5 |
Tonality | 6.5 | 7.0 |
Texture | 7.0 | 7.5 |
// Nothing to compare yet.